Clinical Neuroengineering Symposium Summary

Wed. Sept 5: Clinical Neuroengineering Symposium Summary

Dr. John McDonald
--- Spinal Cord Rehabilitation ---
Discussed the success of functional electric stimulation (FES) for rehabilitation of patients with severe, debilitating spinal cord injuries.
If you wish to contact him, it is best to go through his secretary: Robin Locks: locks at kennedykrieger.org
http://www.spinalcordrecovery.org/
http://www.kennedykrieger.org/kki_staff.jsp?pid=3843
http://www.restorative-therapies.com/

Dr. Romergryko Geocadin
--- Neurosurgery Critical Care ---
Discussed how an animal model was developed to research a clinical problem: monitoring brain injury after ischemia due to heart attacks, and how he and his collaborators were able to develop a novel method/device that is now in human clinical trials. Also mentioned continued research in this area and in the use of hypothermia to limit permanent damage after brain injury.
Email: rgeocadi at jhmi.edu
Seceretary: Gloria Mccoy: gmccoy at jhmi.edu
http://www.hopkinsneuro.org/team_member.cfm?person_id=123

Dr. Charlie Della Santina
--- Vestibular Neuroengineering ---
Described his lab's development of a vestibular neuroprosthesis to treat balance disorders. Involved investigation of the vestibular occular reflex, electrode and circuit design, imaging/characterization of the vestibular canals, analysis after implantation of prosthesis chinchillas and monkeys.
*Interested in MS and PHD students*
Email: charley.dellasantina at jhu.edu
http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/OTOLARYNGOLOGY/della.html
http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/Press_releases/2007/08_06a_07.html

Dr. Nathan Crone
--- Neurology Epilepsy; Cognitive Neurophysiology ----
Discussed the use of implanted subdural electrode grids in epileptic patients to not only localize siezure foci, but using spectral analysis, investigate correlations between brain areas and map functional auditory, sensorimoter and language areas.
Email: necrone at jhmi.edu
http://www.neuro.jhmi.edu/profiles/crone.html
http://www.neuro.jhmi.edu/cogneurophyslab/index.html

Dr. Fred Lenz
--- Neurosurgery ---
Part of research involves pain processing, particularly in the thalamus. During brain surgery in patients with movement disorders (inserting a deep brain stimulator), there is an opportunity to record from single neurons in the thalamus.
Email: flenz1 at jhmi.edu
http://www.neuro.jhmi.edu/profiles/lenz.html

Dr. Dean Wong
--- Neuro Radiology ---
Can direct interested students to many researchers at Hopkins in the area of imaging research, but his particular research interest is Positron Emission Technology, and developing new markers to study a wide range of diseases. Mathematical modelling and large scale computing is a significant part of his lab's work.
Email: dfwong at jhmi.edu
Seceretary: Jean Reyes: jreyes at jhmi.edu
http://wongradiology:7939

Reflections on the NeuroEngineering Symposium: Notes for Future Planning

For reference for future NETI event planners.


Reflections on the Neuroengineering Symposium

Every time we hold seminars/symposia etc, we learn from it. These are
some things I think I would suggest to anyone else trying to set up
something like this:

-- Start early. It took several weeks to even get a response from faculty

-- email secretaries, or other faculty. For instance, it took Dr.
Thakor to push on Dr. Geocadin to respond. Other faculty go primarily
through their secretaries, and don't seem to answer personal emails
from random phd students.

-- pick a date(s) and go with it. I tried asking people when would
work for them, and it was a mess. Finally I chose two dates, and
asked people to pick what worked. Unfortunately, I think the first
date was too close in time and people didnt choose to present then.
Also, it was the last week in August, and it seemed like many faculty
were busy/out of town.

-- email often. goes back to starting early, but it wasn't until my
4th or 5th email invitation to get responses from some people. It
might be annoying to receive so many emails, but if you send a nice
polite invitation, I think people are receptive. I also included a
schedule that included who else was speaking, and the flier, though I
don't know how many people looked at that. Maybe a web link to the
flyer as opposed to an attachment would be the way to go. I don't
know if that helped in encouraging them to present, but maybe

-- Some people contacted me just days before the event saying they
wanted to present. I don't really know how best to deal with this. I
thought the whole thing would be a failure until a week beforehand.

-- 3 hours is too long. I knew that, and Dr. Thakor advised against
it, but I did it anyways, because it would have been too much of a
hassle to organize a third date last minute, and I do think it is
useful for students to see these people before the semester gets under
way full force. Even though there were only like 6 students there by
the end, even if only one student finds an opportunity or idea for
research that they otherwise would not have, I think it is worth it
--- that's what I tell myself anyways :-)

--Students have to decide rotations by mid September, and the more
they see early on the better. Ideally we would have had 4 speakers on
each day, but I would recommend to have the seminars like we did,
late-Aug early Sept.

-- Tell a speaker they have 15 minutes, they take 30. I advised them
to make presentations 15-20 minutes, but they would gladly talk
forever. I'd recommend telling them to make 10 minute presentations,
with clearer instructions on the nature of the talk (NOT data
intensive). Tell them 10 minutes, but schedule 20 minutes.

-- if you are in charge, keep them to their time limits. It's tough
because you don't want to sound rude. Tell them beforehand that
you'll give them a couple minute warning, and stop them after that and
make sure people have time to ask questions. I still wish we had been
able to take more time for student-faculty discussion.

-- make sure you schedule the room before you schedule the symposium.
Luckily I was able to do it the other way around, but that could have
been bad.

-- have a laptop available for people to put their presentation, and
have a laser pointer for them to use

-- try to get presentation titles and abstracts. I didn't, but in
retrospect it would have been nice to have for reference.

-- any other suggestions? please add to the list. we could maybe
give this to future planners of NETI events.

--luke

Meeting Minutes 9/12/07

Meeting Minutes
Neuroengineering Training Grant
9/12/07

Attendance: Nasir Bhanpuri, Andrew Cassidy, Gabriel Colon, Luke Johnson, Issel Lim, Christopher Smith, Aaron Wong

Fall Symposium Part 2
Following the great success of the Fall Symposium featuring clinical faculty organized by L. Johnson, a second symposium proposed to feature those researchers who work in the Mind-Brain Institute. It has remained unclear whether such a seminar would be useful to first year students.

Poster for BME Retreat
A second edition of the poster featuring NETI has been designed by N. Bhanpuri and I. Lim for presenting at the BME retreat this upcoming weekend. However, due to time constraints, it was decided to not have the poster printed out in full form but to instead give out handouts of the poster to interested students. During the poster session, inquiries will be made of interested students as to whether an MBI symposium would be helpful and to ensure that they are on the Neuroengineering mailing list.

Elections
Elections for new officers will be held off until new members have been selected.

Scholarship Essay Contest
N. Bhanpuri has created a final draft of the scholarship essay contest form. Distribution so far has not been very successful, so the contest has been opened up to all interested students in the state of Maryland. Alternative methods of distribution will also be considered, including posting the application on Fastweb.

Website
A. Cassidy intends to update student pages with a list of courses taken or currently taking, as well as some information from the NETI poster and any other information individuals desire to update. S. Hosmane’s information is to be added to the website. The professor pages are also to be updated, as well as the information page regarding the Fall Symposium.

Other Members
A question has arisen regarding the extent of inclusion of individuals interested in Neuroengineering but not presently on the grant. In particular, this is regarding participation in meetings and being added to the Neuroengineering (1) Google group. N. Thakor will be asked for his input prior to making a final decision.